Lately I’ve been doing some reflecting on some online discussions I’ve had with some Facebook friends.
Before I go on, let me say something about FB. A number of folks I know through business have invited me to be their Facebook friends, which of course is flattering. Although I’ve allowed a few business associates in, I try to keep Facebook for actual people I know, most of whom are personal friends, former classmates and such. Please undertstand if I ignore a request. I’d be glad to link up through LinkedIn, which I do use for business. Thanks.
Back to the premise for this post.
A couple of my friends are very outspoken politically. One is on the left and the other on the right. Both are pretty much yellow dog voters and neither is good at seeing the other side. As a result many of their debates result in ad hominem attacks. In my view, if you want to make a point, stick to the issue and support your position with facts. It’s not that different from designing a landscape actually.
Anyway, it made me wonder: Is there a place for critiquing the individual rather than the individual’s actions? I most definitely say “yes.” BUT, and there must be one, it ought to be a positive critique.
Here’s what I’m getting at. If an employee, colleague or child does a really bad job at something, criticize the job,not the person. “Gee, I don’t think this is your best effort” is better than “You are an idiot and incapable of doing anything right!”
BUT, if that same person does a really nice job, sure you can say, “Wow you did a great job!” But you can also say, “You know, Hugo, you have gotten really good at this!” Both are positive, but just as a negative ad hominem attack is personal in a negative sense, if you make it personal in a positive sense, it’s that much more powerful. It’s just my opinion though.
On a related note, if someone compliments you, you can simply say, “Thank you,” or you can even add “Aren’t you nice?” and throw it back!
I’m interested in comments if you have any.







